Nasa will be unable to defend our planet against a doomsday asteroid that could smash into Earth in 2135, a chilling study has revealed.
Researchers found that it might be impossible to stop the space rock – which is the size of the Empire State building – from careering into Earth next century.
Scientists revealed that even their most advanced technology would prove ‘inadequate’ for deflecting such a space rock, which has been dubbed Bennu.
The consequences would be ‘dire’ experts have warned, and the asteroid has sparked fears that it could even wipe out a life for good.
Scientists are investigating the possibility of using a specially designed spacecraft to nuke approaching cosmic objects, in hopes that doing so could deflect the threat.
While it could be possible to divert a near-Earth object (NEO) by slamming into it with a so-called impactor, experts say a nuclear explosion may be the best bet when the time is running out.
In a new paper, scientists from NASA and the National Nuclear Security Administration have laid out a plan for the Hypervelocity Asteroid Mitigation Mission for Emergency Response (HAMMER).
The 8.8-ton HAMMER spacecraft could be used to steer itself directly into a small asteroid or blow the space rock up using a nuclear device, according to BuzzFeed News.
The team has devised a proposal around a potential impact with the 1,600-foot-wide asteroid Bennu, which is currently the destination for NASA’s Osiris-Rex sample return mission.
While Earth isn’t at risk of a collision with Bennu anytime soon, there’s a 1 in 2,700 chance it will slam into our planet sometime next century.
Bennu is also the best-studied asteroid of all the known NEOs, the researchers note.
‘The two realistic responses considered are the use of a spacecraft functioning as either a kinetic impactor or a nuclear explosive carrier to deflect the approaching NEO,’ the authors wrote in the study, published to the journal Acta Astronautica.
But, there are several factors that would determine the best approach.
The asteroid’s size and mass must be taken into consideration, along with the amount of time available before it hits Earth.
Plus, there are always ‘various uncertainties.’
‘Whenever practical, the kinetic impactor is the preferred approach, but various factors, such as large uncertainties or short available response time, reduce the kinetic impactor’s suitability and, ultimately, eliminate its sufficiency,’ the authors wrote.
By driving multiple spacecraft into the asteroid’s path, it could be possible to slow the object down and throw it off course to avoid a collision with Earth.
If the conditions aren’t right to use the kinetic impactor, however, nuking it might be the only option.
‘If the asteroid is small enough, and we detect it early enough, we can do it with the impactor,’ physicist David Dearborn of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory told BuzzFeed News.
‘The impactor is not as flexible as the nuclear option when we really want to change the speed of the body in a hurry.’
Despite ongoing efforts to catalog potential hazards in Earth’s vicinity, scientists have increasingly warned that there are countless large objects that remain undetected.
Given the risk of an inevitable impact sometime in the future, the experts say it’s necessary to plan for the worst.
The researchers will present their proposal at a conference in Japan this coming May.
For now, however, whether or not the HAMMER plan will ever come to fruition remains up in the air.
If you know someone who might like this, please click “Share!”